The Harry Potter remake is in the process of finding its cast, and recent comments from HBO exec Sarah Aubrey have eased one of my biggest fears about the show. HBO's Harry Potter series is expected to arrive in 2026. And while it offers a chance to properly adapt the Harry Potter books — and even expand on certain storylines — it faces significant challenges. Among the biggest is that it will follow the movie adaptations, which aren't very old and remain well-regarded. As such, comparisons are inevitable, and it may be difficult for the reboot to come out on top.
This is one of the harshest realities about the Harry Potter show, and the recent casting news and rumors are proving it's a genuine concern. All the comparisons prove that the remake will need to break out of the shadow of the Harry Potter movies if it wants to succeed. It can't count on nostalgia or established branding to win viewers over, because they'll weigh it against the films anyway. And that's why it's a relief that HBO doesn't seem to be embracing one casting choice that would have leaned too heavily into movie nostalgia.
It Sounds Like The Harry Potter Remake Won't Bring Back The Movie Actors In New Roles
HBO's Sarah Aubrey Says They're Not Looking To Repeat Stars
With conversations about Harry Potter's cast increasing with recent news, one suggestion that's been touted involves the show bringing back the movies' actors. The young cast of the films are all too old to reprise their roles in the upcoming remake — and there would be no point to that — but fans have expressed interest in seeing them tackle new characters. For example, Daniel Radcliffe could easily pass as James Potter, as Harry and his father look alike. And Tom Felton could return as Lucius Malfoy, as he's nearing the age of Draco's father in the books.
Related
10 Best Movies Harry Potter's Young Cast Have Made Since The Franchise Ended
Some of the core Harry Potter cast were all young when the franchise was released, but in the years since, they’ve all tackled some unique projects.
7
While this would be a fun nod to fans of the Harry Potter movies, it doesn't sound like viewers should get their hopes up for it. Speaking with The Hollywood Reporter, HBO's head of IP opened up about the remake's casting process. Aubrey noted that they're looking for people willing to commit to the series long-term and that "there are interesting people raising their hands" for supporting adult roles, like the Marauders. Perhaps the most noteworthy thing she said, however, is that they aren't looking to lean on the movies' talent:
"So, it’s been very, very fun, but we don’t want to repeat people that were in the movies. And it’s always a little nerve-wracking because people so associate those roles with certain actors, but I also think because it’s going to be eight hours of TV, we’re going to immerse them in a different actor’s performance."
This might come as a disappointment to some fans, but it's actually for the best. This comment confirms that the Harry Potter show isn't taking the approach I feared it would, offering hope that it will make a name for itself in the modern fantasy landscape without depending on nostalgia to do it.
The Harry Potter Show's Casting Approach Is Easing One Of My Biggest Fears
The Remake Won't Be Leaning Too Heavily On Nostalgia
One of my biggest fears about the Harry Potter remake is that it will attempt to capitalize on nostalgia and not offer much beyond that. It's clear that Warner Bros. is looking to tap into popular IP, like The Lord of the Rings and Harry Potter, but doing so could evolve into churning out content that's repetitive and feels too much like fan service. Thankfully, Aubrey's comments suggest that the Max show won't lean completely on the franchise's past success, as it's opting to hype up the new cast rather than bring in guaranteed views with familiar faces.
Related
HBO has finally begun announcing its casting choices for its Harry Potter TV remake, and these trendier choices have me concerned for this character.
1
If the remake wanted to, it could bring in actors like Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, and Rupert Grint in order to evoke nostalgia. Doing so wouldn't benefit the new cast or story, but it would likely draw fans of the films. But that's precisely the problem: the upcoming Harry Potter show can't rely on the success of the movies in order to pave its path forward. It needs to stand out from the films, not try to be more like them. And so, Aubrey's words are a relief, and they give me hope that those behind the series understand this.
Why Casting Harry Potter's Former Stars In The Upcoming Reboot Would Be A Mistake
It Would Be Too Distracting & Take Away From The TV Show's Cast
In addition to the Harry Potter reboot needing more than mere nostalgia to get by, there are other reasons the original cast shouldn't be heavily involved, even in new roles. While a small cameo would be fine, anything greater than that would be too distracting. Having one of the original stars play a more prominent part would take viewers out of the story whenever they're on-screen. It would be a reminder that this has been adapted before, and it would make it harder to immerse oneself in the TV remake fully.
The new Harry Potter cast already has big shoes to fill, and we don't need a constant reminder of that on-screen.
Additionally, the new Harry Potter cast already has big shoes to fill, and we don't need a constant reminder of that on-screen. The stars of the TV series deserve the opportunity to make an impression, and it'll be more difficult for them to do so if we're constantly being shown the former cast. There's little doubt appearances by the likes of Daniel Radcliffe or Tom Felton would overshadow the newcomers, especially if they're all in the same scene. HBO's remake is better off highlighting its new talent so that viewers will come to associate them with the franchise, too.
HBO's Early Casting News Paints A More Promising Picture For The Upcoming TV Show
It's Willing To Diverge From The Movies' Approach
Aubrey's comments offer hope that the Harry Potter remake won't depend on movie nostalgia, and they aren't the only positive sign of what's to come. Just one cast member has officially been announced for the reboot, but having John Lithgow play Dumbledore breaks a cardinal rule of the movies already. It marks the first time an American actor has been given an important role in the franchise, and while this may not seem like a huge deal, it shows that the Max series is willing to break away from what came before.
Related
Janet McTeer Proved She’s Perfect For The Harry Potter Remake’s Professor McGonagall With 3 Previous Roles
Janet McTeer has big shoes to fill if she plays Professor McGonagall in the Harry Potter remake, but these 3 previous roles prove she can handle it.
Harry Potter's rumored Snape casting also proves as much, as the series is looking to bring on a Black actor to portray the Hogwarts professor. The remake's Snape casting is a good sign for the show, as it suggests the creators are prioritizing diversity more than the films — and that it's willing to set itself apart from the prior adaptations. We'll have to wait for more Harry Potter casting news to be totally confident in the series' approach, but I feel much better knowing that it wants to be its own thing separate from the films' success.
Source: The Hollywood Reporter
Success!
Harry Potter
Family
Fantasy- Showrunner
- Francisca Gardiner
- Directors
- Mark Mylod
- Franchise(s)
- Harry Potter
Cast
-
John Lithgow
Albus Dumbledore
